ETHICS SYMPOSIUM: IS MEDICAL ETHICS REALLY IN THE BEST INTEREST OF THE PATIENT?
vía Journal of Internal Medicine – Volume 269, Issue 4 – April 2011 – Wiley Online Library.
-
Introduction
You have free access to this contentIs medical ethics doing its job? (pages 366–369)M. G. Hansson and R. ChadwickArticle first published online: 15 MAR 2011 | DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2796.2011.02348.x
-
Part l: Should ideology be allowed to trump patient well-being?
You have free access to this contentViewpoint: Interests, rights and standards of care in the context of globalized medicine (pages 370–374)H. HakerArticle first published online: 15 MAR 2011 | DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2796.2011.02349_1.x
-
You have free access to this contentViewpoint: How to avoid a dichotomy between autonomy and beneficence: from liberalism to communitarianism and beyond (pages 375–379)M. Sutrop
Article first published online: 15 MAR 2011 | DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2796.2011.02349_2.x
-
You have free access to this contentCommentary: Autonomy revisited – a response to H. Haker (pages 380–382)Alastair V. Campbell
Article first published online: 15 MAR 2011 | DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2796.2011.02349_3.x
-
Part ll: The (mis)use of informed consent in medical research
You have free access to this contentViewpoint: Why our conceptions of research and practice may not serve the best interest of patients and subjects (pages 383–387)T. L. BeauchampArticle first published online: 15 MAR 2011 | DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2796.2011.02350_1.x
-
You have free access to this contentCommentary: The distinction between research and practice – a response to T. Beauchamp (pages 388–391)M. F. Verweij
Article first published online: 15 MAR 2011 | DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2796.2011.02350_2.x
-
Part lll: Ethical review boards: Important ethical safeguards or over-burdensome and unnecessary bureaucracy?
You have free access to this contentViewpoint: Are the research ethics committees working in the best interests of participants in an increasingly globalized research environment? (pages 392–395)D. ChalmersArticle first published online: 15 MAR 2011 | DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2796.2011.02351_1.x
-
You have free access to this contentViewpoint: A method to estimate the cost in lives of ethics board review of biomedical research (pages 396–402)S. N. Whitney and C. E. Schneider
Article first published online: 15 MAR 2011 | DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2796.2011.02351_2.x
-
You have free access to this contentCommentary: Systems, rules and the costs of being ethical – a response to D. Chalmers and to S. Whitney and C. Schneider (pages 403–406)S. Holm
Article first published online: 15 MAR 2011 | DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2796.2011.02351_3.x